On 9th January I found a very small bump on the top of my right testicle (near the epididymis). I was experiencing minor discomfort in my groin and this concerned me. I saw a doctor (not my usual doctor, who was away on holidays) and she said probably nothing but best to get an ultrasound.
The ultrasound report (I had the ultrasound on 11th January) said:
Right side: The right testis measures 4.7 x 2.3 x 2.6 and has a normal vascularity and echogenicity. The area that the patient is palpating corresponds to the epididymis which is normal in size. There is a 3.7mm cyst within the epididymis head.
Left side: The left testis measures 4.7 x 2.1 x 3.1cm. There is a 2mm hypoechoic area within the superior aspect of the testis. It does not have any internal vascularity. The testis otherwise has normal vascularity and echogenicity. The epididymis appears normal.
Conclusion: Non-specific 2mm hypoechoic area in the left testis, a tumour is not excluded and a repeat ultrasound in three months’ time is recommended to ensure that this is not increasing in size.
Obviously this was a mixed result.. .Good that the lump i had been concerned about was a epididymal cyst, but bad because there was a new lump which was suspected/seen inside the left testicle. This was obviously concerning to me, even though my doctor said it is nothing to worry about. I freaked out and went to another doctor to order another ultrasound, along with a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, as well as tumour marker blood tests.
The tumour marker blood tests came back normal apart from the AFP which was 6.4 (normal is 0 – 6.0), so it was only marginally above normal.
The CT scan came back normal,The CT scan was an over-reaction on my behalf and i probably shouldnt have had it (the doctor probably shouldnt have ordered it for me)... But it is good to know that if it is TC, the cancer hasnt spread yet (or at least at the time of the CT).
The secondary ultrasound came back with the following report:
Today’s study was performed with reference to the recent scan at …. On 11th January 2006. Both testes were scanned and appeared normal and in spite of very close attention to the anterior surface of the left testis at the site indicated as containing a hypoechoic area on the previous scans, this could not be reproduced. It seems likely that the initial appearance is artefactual but a repeat ultrasound in 3 months time with particular reference to this area is indicated as a minimum follow up. Both sets of films should be brought with him at that time.
-----
This has left me utterly confused! I definitely have a palpable lump on the right side of the left testicle which I don’t believe I could feel 2 weeks ago, but now I can, albeit very small. My doctor (who has now returned from holidays) believes there is nothing abnormal and I have been on antibiotics for the past 10 days. The pain in my groin / lower abdomen has become more of a pain rather than discomfort, however it comes and goes. When pressure is placed on the lump, it causes some degree of discomfort/minor pain. I also have been experiencing lower back pain, however this could be to do with a minor injury I sustained about a month ago lifting weights.
I insisted on being referred to a urologist despite the fact that my doctor believed it was probably not necessary. I could not get an appointment to see the urologist until 10th February, 2006.
Obviously I am concerned, I am 26 years old, a university student and keen athlete.
I would be keen to hear any opinions on any part of my experiences so far... Either in regards to the appropriateness of my actions so far, or advice on how i should handle things in the future.
Thanks.
The ultrasound report (I had the ultrasound on 11th January) said:
Right side: The right testis measures 4.7 x 2.3 x 2.6 and has a normal vascularity and echogenicity. The area that the patient is palpating corresponds to the epididymis which is normal in size. There is a 3.7mm cyst within the epididymis head.
Left side: The left testis measures 4.7 x 2.1 x 3.1cm. There is a 2mm hypoechoic area within the superior aspect of the testis. It does not have any internal vascularity. The testis otherwise has normal vascularity and echogenicity. The epididymis appears normal.
Conclusion: Non-specific 2mm hypoechoic area in the left testis, a tumour is not excluded and a repeat ultrasound in three months’ time is recommended to ensure that this is not increasing in size.
Obviously this was a mixed result.. .Good that the lump i had been concerned about was a epididymal cyst, but bad because there was a new lump which was suspected/seen inside the left testicle. This was obviously concerning to me, even though my doctor said it is nothing to worry about. I freaked out and went to another doctor to order another ultrasound, along with a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, as well as tumour marker blood tests.
The tumour marker blood tests came back normal apart from the AFP which was 6.4 (normal is 0 – 6.0), so it was only marginally above normal.
The CT scan came back normal,The CT scan was an over-reaction on my behalf and i probably shouldnt have had it (the doctor probably shouldnt have ordered it for me)... But it is good to know that if it is TC, the cancer hasnt spread yet (or at least at the time of the CT).
The secondary ultrasound came back with the following report:
Today’s study was performed with reference to the recent scan at …. On 11th January 2006. Both testes were scanned and appeared normal and in spite of very close attention to the anterior surface of the left testis at the site indicated as containing a hypoechoic area on the previous scans, this could not be reproduced. It seems likely that the initial appearance is artefactual but a repeat ultrasound in 3 months time with particular reference to this area is indicated as a minimum follow up. Both sets of films should be brought with him at that time.
-----
This has left me utterly confused! I definitely have a palpable lump on the right side of the left testicle which I don’t believe I could feel 2 weeks ago, but now I can, albeit very small. My doctor (who has now returned from holidays) believes there is nothing abnormal and I have been on antibiotics for the past 10 days. The pain in my groin / lower abdomen has become more of a pain rather than discomfort, however it comes and goes. When pressure is placed on the lump, it causes some degree of discomfort/minor pain. I also have been experiencing lower back pain, however this could be to do with a minor injury I sustained about a month ago lifting weights.
I insisted on being referred to a urologist despite the fact that my doctor believed it was probably not necessary. I could not get an appointment to see the urologist until 10th February, 2006.
Obviously I am concerned, I am 26 years old, a university student and keen athlete.
I would be keen to hear any opinions on any part of my experiences so far... Either in regards to the appropriateness of my actions so far, or advice on how i should handle things in the future.
Thanks.
Comment