Hi all. For my 40th birthday, I got testicular cancer. What'd you get?
To start, I am an artist and designer from the Boston area, a father of one girl, a musician, sometimes a cyclist, sometimes a good cook, and occasionally a useful husband.
In May 2007, I awoke one morning with intense pain, like I'd been kicked in the jewels. After a few weeks of hoping it would go away, then a 10-day round of Cipro antibiotic, I saw a urologist who found that I had developed a tumor in the right testicle. An orchiectomy followed a few weeks later. The biopsy showed this to be pure embryonal carcinoma.
Since that time, I have seen a couple of oncologists in and around Boston and have had CT and PET scans which showed a couple of enlarged abdominal lymph nodes, and a few nodes too small to confirm. My tumor markers before and after surgery have never gone above normal. I'm scheduled to start 2-cycles of chemo [BEP] this Monday.
I don't know if I made the right decision about who to be treated by. I tried to work out being treated at Dana-Farber, but I live just far enough away that commuting in myself would be a chore, and I have nobody I could ask to drive me every day. D-F wanted to do three cycles of chemo. I'm not sure why one doc would want three cycles and another would say two is enough. How can I know who is right?
So I'm electing to be treated outside of the city with a smaller cancer center. The people there seem experienced, competent and friendly, but I'm just not feeling comfortable yet knowing that this legendary institution (D-F) has opened its doors to me. I know you can get chemo anywhere. The drugs are all the same no matter where you get them, or so I'm told. And I've been invited back to Dana Farber for restaging after the two cycles are complete.
Am I wasting time worrying about this? My condition is nowhere near as serious as others with cancer who are perhaps better suited for a place like D-F. Also, is chemo the kind of thing I could potentially drive myself to?
Thanks and best regards.
Sfumato, the walking exclamation point
To start, I am an artist and designer from the Boston area, a father of one girl, a musician, sometimes a cyclist, sometimes a good cook, and occasionally a useful husband.
In May 2007, I awoke one morning with intense pain, like I'd been kicked in the jewels. After a few weeks of hoping it would go away, then a 10-day round of Cipro antibiotic, I saw a urologist who found that I had developed a tumor in the right testicle. An orchiectomy followed a few weeks later. The biopsy showed this to be pure embryonal carcinoma.
Since that time, I have seen a couple of oncologists in and around Boston and have had CT and PET scans which showed a couple of enlarged abdominal lymph nodes, and a few nodes too small to confirm. My tumor markers before and after surgery have never gone above normal. I'm scheduled to start 2-cycles of chemo [BEP] this Monday.
I don't know if I made the right decision about who to be treated by. I tried to work out being treated at Dana-Farber, but I live just far enough away that commuting in myself would be a chore, and I have nobody I could ask to drive me every day. D-F wanted to do three cycles of chemo. I'm not sure why one doc would want three cycles and another would say two is enough. How can I know who is right?
So I'm electing to be treated outside of the city with a smaller cancer center. The people there seem experienced, competent and friendly, but I'm just not feeling comfortable yet knowing that this legendary institution (D-F) has opened its doors to me. I know you can get chemo anywhere. The drugs are all the same no matter where you get them, or so I'm told. And I've been invited back to Dana Farber for restaging after the two cycles are complete.
Am I wasting time worrying about this? My condition is nowhere near as serious as others with cancer who are perhaps better suited for a place like D-F. Also, is chemo the kind of thing I could potentially drive myself to?
Thanks and best regards.
Sfumato, the walking exclamation point
Comment