Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

what to do

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BREwing
    replied
    Hey docabear.

    I sent you a private message.

    Leave a comment:


  • dadmo
    replied
    docabear:
    Everyone is going to heave to forgive me here but I’m going to think out loud. I think the two cycles are a prophylactic measure. If you choose surveillance and have a recurrence you will move directly to 3BEP (I’m picking BEP because of the embryonal carcinoma).
    If you choose surveillance and don’t have a recurrence you win big, really big. All you have are a few physical and mental scars. You have avoided all of the life threatening and shortening effects of the chemo. If you go directly to chemo I think you would get 2EP, since it’s being give as a preventive (I could be wrong on this). It would seem that if the long-term effect of 2EP vs. 3BEP are about the same then why not try and completely avoid the chemo? I am really not trying to push you either way but if it were me I would wait on the chemo. At least that’s my position today. I’m sure if you look at other post I have advocated the chemo, I guess that’s why this is such a hard decision.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott
    replied
    I agree that if you have chemotherapy now, it will probably be two cycles, but the NCCN guidelines say that "if the resected lymph nodes involve a tumor, the decision about whether to use adjuvant chemotherapy is based upon the degree of nodal involvement and the ability of the patient to comply with follow-up." Surveillance might be an option.

    Leave a comment:


  • dadmo
    replied
    docabear:
    Congratulations on getting that RPLND out of the way. If the pathology from the node is positive for cancer the standard protocol would be two rounds of chemo.

    Leave a comment:


  • docabear
    replied
    just had rplnd

    i had my rplnd surgery on 15 may 06 and it went very well. it's not as bad as i thought it was going to be. i'm moving very and planning on going deep sea fishing in a few days although i won't be able to reel any fish in it will still be fun.

    the first part of my path report came in and they found an enlarged node 2.5 X 1.1 X 1.1 so my doc sent it to the experts in the armed forces for further eval still waiting on that to come back. he also refered me to an oncologist to see if i need chemo and if so how many cycles.
    if anyone has any thoughts please let me know

    Leave a comment:


  • docabear
    replied
    i'm having my surgery here at the air force base here in alaska. the surgeron used to work at walter reed army medical center he said he has done quite a few rplnd with the nerve sparing. i'm not to concerned with sperm banking i already had a vas. a couple of years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • dadmo
    replied
    Where are you having your RPLND done? If the doc cannot do the nerve sparing type you may want to bank sperm. Retrograde ejaculation is a potential problem even when you have a surgeon who is highly skilled in this operation.

    Leave a comment:


  • docabear
    replied
    well i decided to take the surgery. i've done a lot of research and in my mind this is the best option right now. my surgery is sched. for the 15th of may.
    i look this way i'm taking the lesser of two evils now if i have to get chemo later i'll deal with it then. hopefully i don't have to get chemo i really don't want my kids to see me that sick. so far i've handled this pretty well and if my kids were to see my really sick i don't think i could handle it as well as i have.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jens
    replied
    Originally posted by docabear
    I just really don't want chemo with all it's side effects. the only good thing is it will be a good diet plan
    Hmmm... I gained a few pounds and they stayed on I'm afraid.

    Have you seen you onco?

    Best wishes.
    Jens

    Leave a comment:


  • docabear
    replied
    thank you jens and mikeygti

    i haven't seen an oncologist yet. and i don't know if my doctor knew that EC tends to skip the abd lymph nodes. I'll be sure to bring it up next time i talk with him.
    I just really don't want chemo with all it's side effects. the only good thing is it will be a good diet plan
    thanks again
    docabear

    Leave a comment:


  • mikeygti
    replied
    I agree with Jens that chemo should be considered if treatment is required.
    E/C has been known to skip the lymph nodes,and end up in the lungs....

    Good luck !

    Leave a comment:


  • Jens
    replied
    Originally posted by docabear
    65%embryonal carcinoma (EC), vascular and intra and extra testicular lymphatic invasion
    Hi docabear.

    From you pathology alone you have an slightly increased risk of spreading and because of a predominance of EC and presence of vascular invasion, RPLND may not be the optimal choice. Chemo should be considered.

    Best wishes
    Jens

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott
    replied
    RPLND surgery is considered most effective within six weeks of the orchiectomy, so if that's an option you are considering, you should get an earlier appointment.

    Leave a comment:


  • docabear
    replied
    My doctor explained surveillance, RPLND surgery and he is going to refer me off post to a civilian oncologist for the chemo. my ct scan included chest and abdomen. i was just wondering about the time span. it will probaly be another month to month and a half before treatment begins if i chose to do the RPLND or Chemo because of the referal to a civilian is this too long or should i request something sooner if possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott
    replied
    Welcome, docabear! It sounds as though you're getting all the normal tests. Did you have a chest x-ray, or did the CT scan include your chest as well as your abdomen? Any word yet on treatment from here? Has your doctor explained surveillance, RPLND surgery, and chemotherapy possibilities?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎