If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
For what it's worth my son's shot was always on the tuesday following his round of chemo. I knew that Leukemia was a possibility because of the treatments but I did't know that it was related to the Neulasta. If that is indeed correct wouldn't it be better to simply give a transfusion when the counts are to low?
I had to check the "drug information sheet" that was given to me with the Neulasta. I seem to recall reading somewhere that there was a very slight chance of developing leukemia from Neulasta, but there was no mention of it in the list of potential side effects given for it, so perhaps you're right.
It's also my understanding that the chemo itself can lead to leukemia - something like a 1% chance if I recall correctly.
I had neulasta 2x...the shot was painless...just under the skin...needed it after round 2 in hospital and and round 3 in the hospital....a little bone pain but nothing that bad...
I just got done 3 weeks ago with chemo, 3 BEP, and after each of the first two rounds I was given a drug called Leukine, which is a white cell booster. I would start getting them the day after my last chemo during my full weeks and recieve them for 5 days after that. I asked the doctor and was told that it was more of a preventative than anything. These where $560 a peice, but you take that times 5 and it adds up. What I found to work best for me was to take a couple of aleeve about 1/2 an hour before I got the shot and then I was OK, otherwise it felt like I had two 500 lb. sumo wrestlers trying to tear me in half, no kidding it hurt that bad. I would continue taking tylenol after that when I would start to feel any pain. Good luck, and remember that this a necessary evil that will soon be a memory.
Hi Aaron,
My son was given Neupogen injections. Throughout his chemo he endured probably 15 or more injections. He was told to take claritan and Aleve after his shots. Believe it or not the bone pain was not too bad. The shots brought up his count which was important because you want to stay on the chemo schedule. The shots themselves were painful though.
Good luck to you!!!!
For what it's worth my son's shot was always on the tuesday following his round of chemo. I knew that Leukemia was a possibility because of the treatments but I did't know that it was related to the Neulasta. If that is indeed correct wouldn't it be better to simply give a transfusion when the counts are to low?
Aaron, my experience was that I got 2 shots of Neulasta both on the Mondays when I was to start cycle 2 and cycle 3. I came in each Monday ready to start the next round and my WBC was too low. But, like everybody says, it is terribly expensive (my bills from United Insurance said $10,000 - I don't know if that is right) and it hurts like hell (I couldn't sleep that night since it felt like my entire skeleton was throbbing). TSX, that is interesting what your nurse told you about when to give it. I hadn't seen that. anyway, make sure your doc has a good reason. it certainly shouldn't be ruled in right now, nor out.
For information, at the beginning of the last week of my 1st and 2nd BEP cycles, my white count dropped to low values. My doctor prescribed me antibiotics (cyprofloxacin) as a precautionary measure to minimise the potential developing an illness that would disrupt my chemotherapy.
My white count then naturally picked up by the start of the next chemotherapy cycle.
Here's another data point for you to consider with the Neulasta. I got a Neulasta shot on the sixth day of the first two 21-day cycles of BEP, as a preventative measure so that my schedule needn't be interrupted due to low WBC counts. I am not getting it on the sixth day of my third and final cycle of BEP, since I am near the end of my chemo schedule and there is little risk that I won't be able to keep on track.
I did get some severe bone pain, mostly as migraine headaches and neck pain, usually 5-7 days after the Neulasta was given. The Neulasta did its thing, as a drug this expensive should - my WBC count two days after the first shot was about 18,700; while my WBC count two days after the second shot was 23,100. To put these numbers into perspective, the "normal range" given on my test result sheets is 4,800-10,800. Before starting 3xBEP, my WBC count was measured at 6,300. At the end of each week of treatment (so far), it was (1) 18,700 (2) 7,400 (3) 7,000 (4) 23,100 (5) 10,600 (6) 6,200
There are a couple of ramifications of having very high white blood cell counts. This is a condition known as leukocytosis, and according to my family medical book (by Johns Hopkins) it may cause (1) abscesses in random locations, and (2) fibrous growth around the heart that can lead to heart disease. I ended up getting something like an abscess in my arm, in conjunction with thrombophlebitis (inflamed vein) from the chemo IV. This may have been exacerbated by the high WBC count since it happened right around the time my count was 23,000.
Here is another piece of information for you to ponder. At the beginning of my treatment, I had a wonderful chemo nurse who explained how many of the drugs worked. In speaking of the Neulasta, she said it was very important that it be given no sooner than 24 hours after the chemo is administered on the fifth day of each cycle (the EP days). She said that although it is made to stimulate WBC's, it can also stimulate active cancer cells through the same mechanism. She said that 24 hours after the EP is administered, pretty much all the cancer cells that are in the stage of development that would be most likely to be "supercharged" by the Neulasta have been killed by the chemo. I have not searched for any independent confirmation on what she's told me, but if it is true, it sounds like you definitely want to get the timing right on administration of Neulasta to avoid accelerating the growth of cancer.
I believe I also recall reading somewhere that there is a small risk (< 1%) of developing Leukemia as a side effect of Neulasta. In case you are wondering, if I had it to do over again, I'd skip the Neulasta shots.
But is this ordinarily taken to prevent the white blood cells from getting too low, or once they appear to be at risk of going too low? I mean, are there situations where it may not be needed and the doctor is actually being prudent?
Originally posted by mrb1980
Folks,
According to my insurance statements, the neulasta injections cost $3,000 each. That's right, three grand. Thank goodness they were covered, otherwise I'd be sleeping in my car.
As I recall, I'd have a BEP round one week, a CBC the next week, then a neulasta injection the following Tuesday. Then, I'd start the cycle over again the next Monday. I don't know how long the injections take before they work.
According to my insurance statements, the neulasta injections cost $3,000 each. That's right, three grand. Thank goodness they were covered, otherwise I'd be sleeping in my car.
As I recall, I'd have a BEP round one week, a CBC the next week, then a neulasta injection the following Tuesday. Then, I'd start the cycle over again the next Monday. I don't know how long the injections take before they work.
Last edited by mrb1980; 05-06-06, 04:42 PM.
Reason: Spelling
They gave my son Neupogen which is less expensive than Neulasta. I believe he needed at least one shot. Maybe that is another alternative. If you need it you should get it. Good luck going through chemo. The first day is the hardest. Dianne
How quickly does the neulasta kick in? It doesn't sound like his doctor's decision would affect the ability to treat effectively, or does it?
I have no idea how much the drug costs (I know these drugs are not cheap, to say the least), but if cost was not a factor and if you were willing to pay out of pocket, would that affect the doctor's decision? If the latter is true, then clearly insurance coverage is one of the doctor's concerns.
My radio onc didn't want to give me Zofran because he assumed it wouldn't be covered. Turns out it was (we pay through the nose for our health insurance, so I was more than happy to let them pay).
Then again, I was in for surgery at 7:30am and home by 2pm, so I guess insurance still wins the game in the end.
I had neulasta during 4xBEP when my WBC counts went below a certain threshold, and I also had aranesp when my RBC counts were too low. My oncology nurses told me that insurance policies only pay for neulasta and aranesp if WBC and RBC counts drop below a certain level. I guess mine did, because I had shots after each round.
I would say your doctor is being a bit premature about dismissing neulasta even before you start chemo. I think the fact that the injections are very expensive may be a factor, I don't know. I would check with your insurance carrier to determine the WBC and RBC levels at which they will approve neulasta and aranesp. If your levels drop below the applicable thresholds and your doctor still won't approve neulasta, I'd get a second opinion.
Just FYI, both the neulasta and aranesp injections are exquisitely painful, at least they were for me. Fortunately, I didn't have any bone pain. Anyway, they sure helped me keep on schedule with my chemo last year.
Last edited by mrb1980; 05-06-06, 03:29 PM.
Reason: Spelling correction
Hi Aaron. I did radiation, so I don't know much about your situation, but it doesn't sound unusual to not use Neulasta for lower dose chemo.
It's my understanding, and it might be faulty, that Neulasta is used to boost WBC count so that chemo does not have to be interrupted due to low counts.
With a lower dose of chemo could it be that this situation is much less likely? All drugs have side effects (i've read about bone pain from WBC boosters, for instance), and it might be best to hold off on Neulasta unless your WBC count does become low. Is your count low already, or did you want to take this as a way to prevent low WBC?
I think you can still confidently say that you are throwing everything you can at the cancer. The neulasta doesn't affect a cure unless it enables more frequent chemo that would otherwise be prevented by a low white blood cell count.
All the best! You'll recover 100% from this (aside from the nut, which -- alas -- does not grow back. )
Leave a comment: