Hi Everyone,
I just received the pathology report from my I/O, and the pathologist has determined the tumor to be a Seminoma with Syncytial Trophoblastic Cells.
The tumor was small, 0.7cm x 0.6cm x 0.6cm, and no metastatic spread was identified on the CT scans. The lymph nodes are not enlarged.
The microscopic description reads: "Sections through a testicle reveal a mass composed of polygonal cells separated by a delicate fibrovascular stroma including a sprinkling of lymphocytes. The tumor cells appear to be of high nuclear grade with vesicular nuclei and medium to large sized nucleoli. The nuclei are enlarged and irregular. Multi-nucleated giant cells are present, and this may represent Syncytial Trophoblastic Cells. The tumor is entirely contained within the testicular parenchyma. The spermatic cord and blood vessels are free of tumors. There is no evidence of a teratomatous component."
My urologist has asked the pathologist to send the tumor slides to University of VA in Charlottesville, for a second opinion. He is doing this because my beta HCG level before the surgery was elevated (33). Before the surgery, he informed us to expect a nonseminoma with likely choriocarcinoma make-up. So, long-story-short, we are a bit surprised at the pathology, given the results of the HCG.
Can any of you veterans shed a little light on this diagnosis?
I just received the pathology report from my I/O, and the pathologist has determined the tumor to be a Seminoma with Syncytial Trophoblastic Cells.
The tumor was small, 0.7cm x 0.6cm x 0.6cm, and no metastatic spread was identified on the CT scans. The lymph nodes are not enlarged.
The microscopic description reads: "Sections through a testicle reveal a mass composed of polygonal cells separated by a delicate fibrovascular stroma including a sprinkling of lymphocytes. The tumor cells appear to be of high nuclear grade with vesicular nuclei and medium to large sized nucleoli. The nuclei are enlarged and irregular. Multi-nucleated giant cells are present, and this may represent Syncytial Trophoblastic Cells. The tumor is entirely contained within the testicular parenchyma. The spermatic cord and blood vessels are free of tumors. There is no evidence of a teratomatous component."
My urologist has asked the pathologist to send the tumor slides to University of VA in Charlottesville, for a second opinion. He is doing this because my beta HCG level before the surgery was elevated (33). Before the surgery, he informed us to expect a nonseminoma with likely choriocarcinoma make-up. So, long-story-short, we are a bit surprised at the pathology, given the results of the HCG.
Can any of you veterans shed a little light on this diagnosis?
Comment