Originally posted by tammytrull
The surveillance protocol you described seems adequate to me - that is, IF it was testicular cancer. Other cancers can be very fast to grow/spread, and the normal TC surveillance protocol may not be adequate. It sounds to me like adenocarcinoma may fall into that category.
In my opinion the mistake is likely in the pathology report. How could adenocarcinoma be mistaken for testicular cancer? Is it so similar that a regular pathologist could not tell them apart under a microscope? If so, this should be a huge motivating factor for getting pathology reports done by someone with a lot of experience in TC.
-TSX
Leave a comment: