Hey guys,
Thanks for your expertise and I hope I can impose again to get your opinions about about chemo vs. wait and watch, which are the two options probably being recommended for me now.
I got the biopsy report and the doctor told me I appear to be Stage 1 pT2, which he said is very good.
The CT scan showed nothing. He said that the oncologist will want to do further blood tests, and his thoughts are based on the assumption that tumor markers go back down.
In medicalese, here's what they told me:
The biopsy found a mixed germ cell tumor with three components:
A. Choriocarcinoma (extensive beta HCG and PLAP Positivity), intratesticular in region of hemorrhage
B. Yolk Sac Tumor (AFP positive), intratesticular in region of hemorrhagic Tumor
C. Classical Seminoma, predominating.
Tumor appears limited to the testis without tunical invovement. Vascular invasion of the predominantly seminomatous elements are seen within the pertesticular tissues but the spermatic cord margin is free of tumor.
In English, the doctor said the seminoma is by far the largest part of the tumor. When the pathologist first reviewed the specimen, they called it a seminoma, but because my elevated tumor markers suggested non-seminoma, he asked them to look more closely and they found the other components.
Of the three, he said the choriocarcinoma, though small, is the most likely potential trouble maker because it's more adept at spreading.
He referred me to an oncologist and said that he will want to do further blood tests to confirm that tumor markers are actually going down. If not, he says the recommendation will be for chemo.
If the tumor markers are down, he says the choices will be watching and waiting or undergoing chemo. His strong recommendation is that I undergo the chemo. If he were me, he says that's what he would do. And he expects that's what the oncologist will recommend.
So, I'm leaning towards undergoing chemo. But would love to hear opinions and advice. Thanks again. Dan
Thanks for your expertise and I hope I can impose again to get your opinions about about chemo vs. wait and watch, which are the two options probably being recommended for me now.
I got the biopsy report and the doctor told me I appear to be Stage 1 pT2, which he said is very good.
The CT scan showed nothing. He said that the oncologist will want to do further blood tests, and his thoughts are based on the assumption that tumor markers go back down.
In medicalese, here's what they told me:
The biopsy found a mixed germ cell tumor with three components:
A. Choriocarcinoma (extensive beta HCG and PLAP Positivity), intratesticular in region of hemorrhage
B. Yolk Sac Tumor (AFP positive), intratesticular in region of hemorrhagic Tumor
C. Classical Seminoma, predominating.
Tumor appears limited to the testis without tunical invovement. Vascular invasion of the predominantly seminomatous elements are seen within the pertesticular tissues but the spermatic cord margin is free of tumor.
In English, the doctor said the seminoma is by far the largest part of the tumor. When the pathologist first reviewed the specimen, they called it a seminoma, but because my elevated tumor markers suggested non-seminoma, he asked them to look more closely and they found the other components.
Of the three, he said the choriocarcinoma, though small, is the most likely potential trouble maker because it's more adept at spreading.
He referred me to an oncologist and said that he will want to do further blood tests to confirm that tumor markers are actually going down. If not, he says the recommendation will be for chemo.
If the tumor markers are down, he says the choices will be watching and waiting or undergoing chemo. His strong recommendation is that I undergo the chemo. If he were me, he says that's what he would do. And he expects that's what the oncologist will recommend.
So, I'm leaning towards undergoing chemo. But would love to hear opinions and advice. Thanks again. Dan
Comment