Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

just when i thought everything was going good....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • just when i thought everything was going good....

    I called mary ann yesterday to get Brian's markers that were done yesterday morning, they went up! his hcg went from 2.9 to 3.3

    im freaking out now, does this mean he is getting sicker again? i asked mary ann why they cant just do something soon and she said that want to wait a few weeks! im concerned that within those fews weeks, the markers will rise high, i know its agressive. he still goes to the liver surgeon tuesday, but i dont see a point, seeing how his markers are still elevated, this is not fair to him. so as you can see, its a another set back


    Dawn
    Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
    mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
    hcg was 176,000!
    completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
    BEPx3 until 7/13/07
    7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
    10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
    AFP & HCG normal
    12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
    12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
    2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
    ALL CLEAR

  • #2
    You shouldn't consider that an increase. Both test results are well within normal range, and AFP measurements can fluctuate a bit. Imagine you're scooping letters out of alphabet soup with a spoon. With the same number of letters in the bowl, one spoonful might pull out four letters, and another might scoop out six.
    Scott
    right inguinal orchiectomy 6/5/2003 > nonseminoma, stage I > surveillance > L-RPLND 6/24/2005 for recurrence, suspected teratoma but found seminoma, stage II > chylous ascites until 9/2005 > surveillance and "all clear" since

    Your donation funds Livestrong services for people facing cancer now. Please sponsor my ride!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Scott
      You shouldn't consider that an increase. Both test results are well within normal range, and AFP measurements can fluctuate a bit. Imagine you're scooping letters out of alphabet soup with a spoon. With the same number of letters in the bowl, one spoonful might pull out four letters, and another might scoop out six.

      the surgeon said his AFP is normal, but the HCG is elevated...at 3.3, so this is not a bad thing? the last blood test he had before yesterday was on monday the 10th
      Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
      mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
      hcg was 176,000!
      completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
      BEPx3 until 7/13/07
      7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
      10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
      AFP & HCG normal
      12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
      12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
      2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
      ALL CLEAR

      Comment


      • #4
        Dawn:
        I wouldn't worry about that little bit of change. My son's numbers bounced around for quite awhile after he was treated. He had 4-5 checks in a row where the numbers went up. It used to freak me out to, now the doctor just lists his labs as normal.
        Son Jason diagnosed 4/30/04, stage III. Right I/O 4/30/04. Graduated College 5/13/04. 4XEP 6/7/04 - 8/13/04. Full open RPLND 10/13/04. All Clear since.

        Treated by Dr. Rakowski of Midland Park, NJ. Visited Sloan Kettering for protocol advice. RPLND done at Sloan Kettering.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by dadmo
          Dawn:
          I wouldn't worry about that little bit of change. My son's numbers bounced around for quite awhile after he was treated. He had 4-5 checks in a row where the numbers went up. It used to freak me out to, now the doctor just lists his labs as normal.
          DADMO, IT WENT UP HOW LONG AFTER TREATMENT? WAS IT THE HCG? OR AFP. BIANS AFP IS NORMAL, DO YOU REMEBER THE #'S?

          DAWN
          Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
          mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
          hcg was 176,000!
          completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
          BEPx3 until 7/13/07
          7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
          10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
          AFP & HCG normal
          12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
          12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
          2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
          ALL CLEAR

          Comment


          • #6
            Dawn,
            Both AFP and HCG will bounce a little. What is the normal range for the lab yoyu are using? Most labs list 0-5 as the normal range. 2.9 to 3.3 really is a small fuuctuation that may have no significance.
            Retired moderator. Husband, left I/O 16Dec2005, stage I seminoma with elevated b-HCG, no LVI, RTx15 (25Gy). All clear ever since.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Karen
              Dawn,
              Both AFP and HCG will bounce a little. What is the normal range for the lab yoyu are using? Most labs list 0-5 as the normal range. 2.9 to 3.3 really is a small fuuctuation that may have no significance.

              HI KAREN, its the lab at sloan kettering... not sure what the range is.. his dr. said yesterday. that his hcg is slightly elevated. i believe his AFP is normal.
              Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
              mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
              hcg was 176,000!
              completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
              BEPx3 until 7/13/07
              7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
              10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
              AFP & HCG normal
              12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
              12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
              2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
              ALL CLEAR

              Comment


              • #8
                Dawn,

                I must concur with everyone here. The difference between 2.9 and 3.3 is minuscule, and likely to be within the margin of error of the test. I would be more concerned if it jumped to, say, 10. No matter how reputable the lab is, you will always find some variations, and the change you described seems to be statistically insignificant.
                "Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." -Ferris Bueller
                11.22.06 -Dx the day before Thanksgiving
                12.09.06 -Rt I/O; 100% seminoma, multifocal; Stage I-A; Surveillance; Six years out! I consider myself cured.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Fed
                  Dawn,

                  I must concur with everyone here. The difference between 2.9 and 3.3 is minuscule, and likely to be within the margin of error of the test. I would be more concerned if it jumped to, say, 10. No matter how reputable the lab is, you will always find some variations, and the change you described seems to be statistically insignificant.
                  FED, I SOOOO hope you are right, i just dont understand why, in the beginning, the markers came down so fast! and now, its like 1 point every 2 weeks and now its going up. and im scared that, it will go up higher before his next test. do you think that if it was going to go up, it would have gone higher than what it did?
                  Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
                  mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
                  hcg was 176,000!
                  completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
                  BEPx3 until 7/13/07
                  7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
                  10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
                  AFP & HCG normal
                  12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
                  12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
                  2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
                  ALL CLEAR

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Dawn:
                    If he had active disease I would expect a large jump in the markers, these small flucuations are within the statistical margin of error. When Jason's HCG bounced around it went from less then 2 to 4.
                    Son Jason diagnosed 4/30/04, stage III. Right I/O 4/30/04. Graduated College 5/13/04. 4XEP 6/7/04 - 8/13/04. Full open RPLND 10/13/04. All Clear since.

                    Treated by Dr. Rakowski of Midland Park, NJ. Visited Sloan Kettering for protocol advice. RPLND done at Sloan Kettering.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dadmo
                      Dawn:
                      If he had active disease I would expect a large jump in the markers, these small flucuations are within the statistical margin of error. When Jason's HCG bounced around it went from less then 2 to 4.
                      his hcg? or his afp fluctuated? im sorry im asking so many questions

                      dawn
                      Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
                      mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
                      hcg was 176,000!
                      completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
                      BEPx3 until 7/13/07
                      7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
                      10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
                      AFP & HCG normal
                      12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
                      12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
                      2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
                      ALL CLEAR

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DAWN82
                        FED, I SOOOO hope you are right, i just dont understand why, in the beginning, the markers came down so fast! and now, its like 1 point every 2 weeks and now its going up.
                        OK, here comes the geek in me, but this might help you understand why the drop is quick at first and then slows down. The degradation of tumor markers in the body follows an exponential decay. The link I have placed will show you the general equation that governs such phenomenon. Since the degradation depends on the amount of circulating marker, the more marker there is, the faster the rate of decay. After a while, there will be little marker, so the rate will decrease proportionally. I don't know if this is too technical, but it is the accurate explanation for why the drops are so dramatic during treatment and then slow down considerably. Hope this helps.
                        "Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." -Ferris Bueller
                        11.22.06 -Dx the day before Thanksgiving
                        12.09.06 -Rt I/O; 100% seminoma, multifocal; Stage I-A; Surveillance; Six years out! I consider myself cured.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fed
                          OK, here comes the geek in me, but this might help you understand why the drop is quick at first and then slows down. The degradation of tumor markers in the body follows an exponential decay. The link I have placed will show you the general equation that governs such phenomenon. Since the degradation depends on the amount of circulating marker, the more marker there is, the faster the rate of decay. After a while, there will be little marker, so the rate will decrease proportionally. I don't know if this is too technical, but it is the accurate explanation for why the drops are so dramatic during treatment and then slow down considerably. Hope this helps.

                          THANK YOU FED ... I THINK I UNDERSTAND
                          IM JUST SCARED, I KNOW MAYBE I SHOULDNT BE, BUT I AM.
                          Fiance Brian, dx:stage IIIC non-sem 4/18/07
                          mets to lungs,liver,abdomin,large tumor near kidney
                          hcg was 176,000!
                          completed 1 rnd of TIP(had bad reaction to taxol)
                          BEPx3 until 7/13/07
                          7/26/07 post chemo ct-scan shwd shrinkage & fewer lung tumors
                          10/17/07 @ MSKCC Liver FREE of cancer! necrotic & small focus of teratoma.
                          AFP & HCG normal
                          12/7/07 RPLND,right orchiectomy @ MSKCC
                          12/18/07, rcvd pathology,all clear! no cancer!
                          2/11/08 -Lung surgery dne @ MSKCC
                          ALL CLEAR

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            In June, when I was just getting ready to be discharged after high-dose chemo, and my HCG had been steadily declining, out of the blue, it went from 1.9 to 2.9. The blip freaked us out, but that's all it was--a blip. After that, the numbers continued to come down, and now they are less than 1.

                            Einhorn said that these blips happen, and that the may be due to the practical limits of labs in measuring the hormone, or due to normal fluctuations in the body. He also says that if disease is coming back, HCG will really shoot up--like it will be near 100 within a week or two. I certainly found that to be the case when I had a relapse.

                            All of which is to say, I know it's hard not to worry, but there is nothing alarming, from a medical point of view, about the slight rise in Brian's numbers.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hi Dawn:

                              Hang in there. I'll echo what everyone esle said, this is a fluctuation likely within the error range of the test.

                              I would not be surprised if you ran the test on different portions of the SAME blood sample and saw this type of variation.

                              I know it's stressful, but at this point, you should't worry too much.

                              Thoughts and prayers coming you way!
                              Fish
                              TC1
                              Right I/O 4/22/1988
                              RPLND 6/20/1988
                              TC2
                              Left I/O 9/17/2003
                              Surveillance

                              Tho' much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are; one equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will; to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              😀
                              🥰
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎